|
27 February 2007 21:43
Subject: Fw: Special Status for the Forest of Dean
Barry Gardiner MP
Minister responsible for National Parks, AONBs and
Natural England. House of Commons
London.
Dear Mr Gardiner,
I am writing to you on behalf of an organisation
called Dean Forest Voice (DFV).
DFV was born out of a meeting that was called at the
Miners Welfare Hall in CinderFord in the Forest of Dean on 9th March
2001. The main objective of DFV is: To promote and maintain the
Forester identity and enhance the pride and culture of the people of
the Forest of Dean by creating a powerful voice capable of being
heard and taken account of, particularly at all levels of government
and every other administrative organisation in the the Forest of
Dean.
To date DFV has over 1000 members and is growing.
The issue of a special status for the Forest of Dean
came to a head in the late 1990s. In the run up to the general
election in 1997, the Shadow Secretary of State for the Environment
(Frank Dobson) visited the area and gave a commitment to offer the
Forest of Dean "a new custom built special status appropriate to its
unique history and character"
The new Labour Government subsequently asked the
Countryside Commission (soon to become the Countryside Agency) to
look again at the area and make recommendations on how the broad
aims behind special status might be best achieved. In 1998 the
Countryside Commission commissioned a technical review of the
relevant issues and the potential management structures that could
deliver the appropriate level of protection. In April 1999 the
review concluded that AONB status provided the most suitable basis
for the area's designation, but that this status "should be
interpreted in a new and imaginative way to enhance social, cultural
and economic as well as environmental objectives".
The Countryside Agency Board decided in late 1999 to
defer the decision on special status in favour of trialling an
Integrated Rural Development (IRD) approach in the area, run through
the Agency's South West Region team. This was at a time when the
Agency was developing its ideas on IRD.
From the onset DFV took the view that they were
opposed to AONB perceiving it as imposing external and unwanted
restrictions in an area whose unique qualities, and problems,
require locally-derived solutions.
DFV were closely involved in, and worked with the IRD
project manager (Val Kirby) in running some of the studies that took
place , as well as keeping the project managers in touch with grass
root local opinion.
The partners involved in the IRD programme included:
English Heritage
English Nature
The Environment Agency DEFRA (MAFF)
Forest of Dean District Council Forest Enterprise
Glos. Association of Parish and Town Councils Glos
County Council
Glos. Rural Community Council Government Office for
the SW South West RDA
The Countryside Agency
Phase one of the Forest of Dean IRD programme
concluded that the projects undertaken produced both information and
ideas to aid the social and economic regeneration of the Forest of
Dean.
The information included the production of baseline
studies that included the 'Dean by Definition' work and the
'Landscape Character Assessment.
These studies provided a foundation for a second
phase of work, which built on the specific culture, heritage and
character of the Forest of Dean.
The studies undertaken were:
The Landscape Character Study The Dean by Definition
Project The draft Tourism Study
The Biodiversity Study
Archaeological Survey and Historic Landscape
Assessment
The essence of the innovative, local development
approach being that the distinctiveness or special qualities of the
area should be clearly articulated and should form the basis of
measures for protection and regeneration.
1. By identifying and articulating what is special
through
an analysis of the 'baseline studies', to establish a
firm basis for future decision making in the Forest-of Dean.
2. By building on what's special to foster the
sustainable development of the Forest of Dean's economy and
communities.
3. By exerting appropriate influence on the areas
planning authorities, to foster the better conservation and
enhancement of what is special about the Forest of Dean's landscape
and environment.
4. By exerting appropriate influence on the area's
planning authorities, to foster the better conservation and
enhancement of what is special about the Forest of Dean's culture,
economy, heritage and biodiversity.
5. To derive lessons of possible wider
applicability in rural England, including advice on the value of
this approach/methodology for managing, protecting and enhancing
special landscapes and, more generally, the management of 'local
special-ness'. DFV are of the opinion that the data and information
collected - when incorporated into supplementary planning guidance -
and given teeth, would have given the neccessary protection and
'special status' required for the Forest of Dean. The information
and data would be used to influence those organisations that prepare
and implement plans, strategies and prospectuses of various sorts,
namely:
* The Planning Authorities (i.e. at District and
County levels)
* The Local Strategic Partnerships (at District and
County level)
* SWRDA
* Other Economic Development Players * Parish and
Town Councils
* Transport Planners and Providers including the
Highways Dept.
* Tourism Organisations * Land Managers
* Other regional and national bodies, such as MAFF (DEFRA),
English Partnerships, English Nature and the Environment Agency
The evaluation of what became Phase 1 of the
programme recommended that the programme be continued but with
changes of emphasis, and in April 2003 the Countryside Agency Board
committed funding to the second Phase, which became known as
'Building On What's Special' (BOWS) This Phase was initially funded
to run until March 2005. Delays in replacing staff
resulted in a decision by the Countryside Agency Board in 2004 to
extend the Programme until March 2006.
Responsibility for funding and leading the Programme
switched from the Countryside Agency to the South West Regional
Development Agency in April 2005.
The IRD process and the Baseline Studies are now
shelved and with SWARDA.
In Nov. 2006 The Forest of Dean Integrated Rural
Development Pilot Programme (Final Evaluation Report) was published
(prepared for SWRDA by Land Use Consultants)No conclusive decision
on the future status of the Forest of Dean is reached. In the
reports key Findings it states (6.77)
"It is significant that the RDA's strategic interest
in the Programme focussed on its purpose as a local delivery
mechanism (and in this respect the RDA was significantly more
involved in other regeneration programmes that the Countryside
Agency had been). The RDA had little strategic interest in the
Programme's other purpose as a pilot of national thinking on IRD.
This led it to be less interested in the more innovative aspects of
the Programme, although it should be said that by the time the RDA
took over responsibility for the Programme it was entering the final
completion stages. It is regrettable that once the paperwork and
funds were transferred to the RDA, the Countryside Agency, which
could have maintained the focus on the'test-bedding' purpose of the
Programme, had no involvement in the management of the Programme."
(6.62) concludes...." There remains the real need for
a 'champion' to be found who will take forward the philosophy of IRD
and the outputs of the baseline studies......... Unless one of the
key agencies or bodies with a cross-sectional interest in the
District's economic and social development and environmental
protection takes this role, many of the achievements of the IRD
Programme risk being lost.
DFV understand that there is fresh impetus to gain
AONB status for the Forest of Dean. Although there is a strong lobby
for this, there are also as many opposed to it.
When consideration is given to any forthcoming
request for a change in status, we ask you to consider the work
already completed in the baseline studies and the sums of money that
have been spent to date on the project, get it off the shelf - dust
it down- and complete the project.
DFV are still of the opinion that this is the best
way forward for the Forest of Dean.
Yours sincerely
Keith Morgan (For and on behalf of Dean Forest Voice)
|